Thông tin chung
  English
  Đề tài NC khoa học
  Bài báo, báo cáo khoa học
  Hướng dẫn Sau đại học
  Sách và giáo trình
  Các học phần và môn giảng dạy
  Giải thưởng khoa học, Phát minh, sáng chế
  Khen thưởng
  Thông tin khác
  Tài liệu tham khảo
  Hiệu chỉnh
 
Số người truy cập: 109,414,587

 A comparison of the surface pressure distribution of circular cables and helical fillet cables under wind attack: A wind tunnel test study
Tác giả hoặc Nhóm tác giả: Duy Thao Nguyen, Duy Hung Vo, Viet Hai Do
Faculty of Road and Bridge Engineering, The University of Danang – University of Science and Technology, Vietnam
Nơi đăng: Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res. eISSN 1792-8036 pISSN 2241-4487 (ESCI, Scopus Q2); Số: vol 14;Từ->đến trang: 15393-15399;Năm: 2024
Lĩnh vực: Kỹ thuật; Loại: Bài báo khoa học; Thể loại: Quốc tế
TÓM TẮT
This study examines the aerodynamic performance and surface pressure distribution features of circular and helical fillet stay cables when subjected to wind using wind tunnel testing. The research seeks to clarify the aerodynamic performance disparities between conventional circular stay cables and helical fillet cables, providing valuable insights into their appropriateness for cable-supported structures exposed to wind-induced vibrations. The study initially investigates the aerodynamic efficiency of circular and helical fillet cables. Afterwards, the wind tunnel captures the distribution of surface pressure on both cable surfaces. The findings suggest that circular stay cables may undergo cable dry galloping, whereas helical fillet cables demonstrate stability when subjected to wind forces. Furthermore, there are noticeable differences in the surface pressure distribution patterns between circular stay cables and helical fillet cables. Circular stay cables provide a symmetric distribution of pressure, with uniform pressure magnitudes along their surfaces, forming a symmetric pattern. On the other hand, helical fillet cables exhibit modified airflow patterns, leading to asymmetric pressure on cable surface. Furthermore, the dry galloping observed in circular cables is attributed to the presence of low-frequency components. In contrast, helical fillet cables exhibit a more regulated incidence of low-frequency vortices, making them less prone to wind-induced vibrations.
ABSTRACT
This study examines the aerodynamic performance and surface pressure distribution features of circular and helical fillet stay cables when subjected to wind using wind tunnel testing. The research seeks to clarify the aerodynamic performance disparities between conventional circular stay cables and helical fillet cables, providing valuable insights into their appropriateness for cable-supported structures exposed to wind-induced vibrations. The study initially investigates the aerodynamic efficiency of circular and helical fillet cables. Afterwards, the wind tunnel captures the distribution of surface pressure on both cable surfaces. The findings suggest that circular stay cables may undergo cable dry galloping, whereas helical fillet cables demonstrate stability when subjected to wind forces. Furthermore, there are noticeable differences in the surface pressure distribution patterns between circular stay cables and helical fillet cables. Circular stay cables provide a symmetric distribution of pressure, with uniform pressure magnitudes along their surfaces, forming a symmetric pattern. On the other hand, helical fillet cables exhibit modified airflow patterns, leading to asymmetric pressure on cable surface. Furthermore, the dry galloping observed in circular cables is attributed to the presence of low-frequency components. In contrast, helical fillet cables exhibit a more regulated incidence of low-frequency vortices, making them less prone to wind-induced vibrations.
© Đại học Đà Nẵng
 
 
Địa chỉ: 41 Lê Duẩn Thành phố Đà Nẵng
Điện thoại: (84) 0236 3822 041 ; Email: dhdn@ac.udn.vn